What one round-turn forex trade costs at each broker, with the spread, the commission and the conversion fee added up rather than quoted separately.
Brokers advertise one number and charge three. A raw-spread account quoting 0.0 pips takes its money in commission; a zero-commission account takes it in the spread. Neither figure is comparable to the other on its own.
Pick a broker and this adds up all three from what that broker publishes, and converts the total back into pips so two different pricing models can be held against each other.
Spread and commission are the selected broker's own published figures.
A model, not a quote. Every figure here comes from what a broker publishes or what you type, and real fills, spreads and rates move.
A raw-spread account quotes 0.1 pips and charges $7 round turn. One standard lot with a $10 pip value costs $1 in spread and $7 in commission: $8 all in, or 0.8 pips.
A commission-free account quoting 1.2 pips costs $12 and nothing else: 1.2 pips all in. The account advertising zero commission is half as expensive again.
Reverse it at ten lots and nothing changes, because both scale together. What does change the answer is a conversion fee, which scales with the amount converted rather than with the number of lots.
Every spread here is the broker's own published average. Real spreads widen around economic releases, at the session rollover and whenever liquidity thins, and none of that is in the figure.
Treat the result as a comparison between brokers under similar conditions, not as a prediction of what your next fill will cost.
Because it is the only way to compare a commission-based account with a spread-based one. Money answers what this trade costs; pips answer which broker is cheaper.
Round turn: the full cost of opening and closing. Where a broker publishes only a per-side figure it is doubled, and where it publishes both the explicit round-turn number is used.
Because they describe it in prose rather than as a percentage. Of the brokers with usable cost data, only a minority publish a figure you can calculate with. That absence is itself worth knowing.
No. This is the cost of opening and closing. Financing accrues per night held and is a separate calculation entirely.
Because they publish their spread as "variable" or their commission as "account-dependent". A calculator that filled those in with a plausible number would be inventing data.