Seventy-one of the hundred brokers we rate advertise forex spreads "from 0.0 pips". That figure is the best price a broker has ever been able to quote, not the price you will get, and it says nothing about the commission charged beside it. This page compares what a EUR/USD trade actually costs.
How this list is ordered71 of the 100 brokers we rate advertise a spread "from 0.0 pips", which is a commission account rather than free trading, so that figure cannot rank them. This list is ordered by our costs score, which weighs commission and overnight financing alongside the spread, and prints each broker's advertised figure beside it. Treat that figure as a starting point, not a promise.Brokers holding no licence are left off these lists. You can still read their reviews.
One line each, expanded into a full profile further down.
"From 0.0 pips" is a minimum. It means the broker's system has quoted a zero spread at some point under ideal conditions - deepest liquidity, quietest market - and it tells you nothing about the other twenty-three hours of the day.
Two things turn it into a real price. The first is the average: what the spread actually was, measured over weeks rather than at its best moment. The second is the commission, which raw accounts charge precisely because their spread is tight - typically $3.50 per lot per side, which is about 0.7 pips on a standard EUR/USD position before the spread is counted at all.
The table below puts all three next to each other, and the gap between column one and column two is the point of this page.
| Broker | Advertised from | Recorded average, EUR/USD | Recorded average, GBP/USD | Commission | All-in EUR/USD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 pips | 0.1 pips (Raw Spread) | 0.4 pips (Raw Spread) | $3.50 per side / $7 round turn (Raw Spread MetaTrader) | Approx. 0.8 pips | |
| 0.0 pips | 0.03 pips (Edge) | 0.04 pips (Edge) | $3.50 per side / $7 round turn (Edge) | Approx. 0.73 pips | |
| 0.0 pips | Dynamic; published through live/historical spread tool | Dynamic; published through live/historical spread tool | $2.25 per side / $4.50 round turn, Zero | Approx. 0.5 pips, Zero | |
| 0.0 pips | Approx. 0.9 pips, Standard | Approx. 1.1 pips, Standard | Up to $3.50 per side / $7 round turn, Raw Spread | Approx. 0.7 pips, Raw Spread | |
| 0.0 pips | Approx. 0.1 pips, Raw Spread | Approx. 0.3 pips, Raw Spread | $3.50 per side / $7 round turn, Raw Spread | Approx. 0.8 pips | |
| 0.0 pips | 0.8 pips Standard, as at 6 July 2026 | 0.9 pips Standard, as at 6 July 2026 | $7 round turn, Raw; $0 on Standard and Pro | Not on record | |
| 0.8 pips | Approx. 0.8 pips | Approx. 1.0 pip | $0 on Standard and Ultra Low accounts | Approx. 0.8 pips | |
| 0.0 pips | Approx. 0.06 pips, Raw | Approx. 0.2 pips, Raw | $3.50 per side / $7 round turn, Raw | Approx. 0.76 pips | |
| 0.0 pips | 0.43 pips on cTrader | 0.70 pips on cTrader | $3.50 per side / $7 round turn | Approx. 1.13 pips |
From our broker records. The average columns name the account the figure was recorded on, because a raw account and a standard account at the same broker are different products at different prices - our records are not all on the same account basis, so read the account name before comparing two rows.
Read the first two columns together. Six of these ten advertise 0.0 pips; their recorded averages run from 0.03 pips at TabTrade to 0.43 at FxPro. Same headline, fourteen times the spread.
Then read the last column, which adds the commission back. Once that is done the ten cluster far more tightly than the headlines suggest: most land between 0.7 and 0.8 pips all in, and the differences that remain come from commission rather than spread.
On that measure the cheapest broker on this page is Fusion Markets, at about 0.5 pips all in - not because its spread is the tightest, which it is not, but because it charges $2.25 per side where everyone else charges $3.50. That is a $2.50 saving on every round-turn lot, it applies whatever the spread happens to be doing, and it is the single largest structural cost advantage here. The most expensive is FxPro at about 1.13, despite advertising the same 0.0 pips as the rest.
One warning about comparing the average columns across rows. Our records do not all describe the same account: the figure for Exness is its Standard account and the figure for IC Markets is its Raw account, so the nine-fold gap between them is mostly a comparison of two different products. Each cell names its account for that reason.
| Broker A | Broker B | |
|---|---|---|
| Advertised minimum EUR/USD | 0.0 pips | 0.1 pips |
| Measured average EUR/USD | 0.7 pips | 0.3 pips |
| Round-turn commission | $7 | $7 |
| Typical cost per lot | About $14 | About $10 |
Broker A wins every comparison table that lists minimum spreads. Broker B is roughly 30% cheaper to actually trade with.
This is not hypothetical arithmetic - it is the difference between the two columns in the table above, and it is why this list is not ordered by who advertises the smallest number.
Comparable average-spread data across brokers is rare, because it requires somebody to record live quotes from many brokers simultaneously over a sustained period. One such comparison exists for five of these ten: measurements taken by Datalyst in April 2026, covering seven major currency pairs.
It should be read with its provenance in mind. The figures were published by TabTrade, which is one of the brokers measured and comes out best in them. That does not make them wrong - Datalyst is a spread-measurement service and the numbers are consistent with our own records - but a scorecard published by a participant is not the same thing as an audit, and we are not going to present it as one.
| Broker | Average, 7 major pairs | EUR/USD average |
|---|---|---|
| 0.17 pips | 0.10 pips | |
| 0.04 pips | 0.03 pips | |
| 0.10 pips | 0.04 pips | |
| 0.74 pips | 0.18 pips | |
| 0.49 pips | Not published |
Measured by Datalyst over seven major currency pairs in April 2026 and published by TabTrade, one of the brokers measured. Spreads only - commission is not included. Covers five of the ten brokers on this page, and the accounts measured are the brokers' raw-style accounts.
On that measurement TabTrade averaged 0.04 pips across the seven majors, Exness 0.10, IC Markets 0.17, FxPro 0.49 and XM 0.74 - a nineteen-fold spread between the tightest and widest, all of whom describe themselves as competitively priced.
Two caveats beyond the provenance. These are spreads only, so the commission still has to be added, and a broker averaging 0.04 pips with a $7 round turn is not cheaper than one averaging 0.6 pips with no commission. And the measurement is from April: spreads move with liquidity, and five months is a long time in this market.
A standard account charges no commission and builds the broker's margin into a wider spread. A raw account quotes tighter and charges commission separately. Neither is inherently cheaper, and the arithmetic is closer than most people expect.
| Standard | Raw | |
|---|---|---|
| Average EUR/USD spread | 0.8 pips | 0.1 pips |
| Spread cost, one lot | $8 | $1 |
| Round-turn commission | $0 | $7 |
| Total | $8 | $8 |
Identical. Which is the usual outcome when both accounts are priced honestly, because the broker is charging for the same service either way.
Raw pricing still earns its place for two reasons that are not about the total. A tighter bid-ask improves the precision of entries and exits, which matters to strategies working in small increments. And commission is a fixed, knowable cost, where spread widening is neither.
Standard accounts win on simplicity: one number, no arithmetic, and no unpleasant surprise when the commission on a busy month is added up.
| Cost difference | |
|---|---|
| 10 lots a month | $40 |
| 50 lots a month | $200 |
| 100 lots a month | $400 |
| 500 lots a month | $2,000 |
| 1,000 lots a month | $4,000 |
Based on a 0.4-pip difference in all-in cost, or about $4 per standard lot - roughly the gap between the cheapest and dearest accounts on this page.
At ten lots a month it is a rounding error. At five hundred it is a salary. This is the entire reason scalpers and algorithmic traders read spread tables closely and everyone else probably should not.
This page ranks on cost, and cost alone is a narrow question. Look at the rating column beside each broker and you will see the list is not in overall-rating order: IC Trading and IUX price extremely well and rate 7.0 and 6.8 overall, because pricing is one of six things we score and regulation is another.
IC Trading operates under a single Mauritius licence and was founded in 2022. IUX holds Mauritius and South African registrations. Fusion Markets and Focus Markets are ASIC-regulated Australian firms. Exness holds eleven licences across as many jurisdictions but no statutory compensation scheme behind the entity most international clients are onboarded to. TabTrade launched in 2026 and, on our record, offers no negative balance protection.
None of that makes them bad choices. It makes them different trades: a tighter spread in exchange for a thinner safety net, which is a reasonable exchange to make deliberately and a poor one to make by accident.
| Broker | Regulators | Founded | Client money segregated | Negative balance protection | Compensation scheme |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASICCySECFSA (Seychelles)+2 | 2007 | Yes | Yes | ICF up to €20,000 for eligible EU clients; Raw Trading Ltd insolvency insurance up to US$1,000,000 | |
| FSC (Mauritius) | 2026 | Yes | No | No statutory investor compensation scheme | |
| ASICFSA (Seychelles)VFSC (Vanuatu) | 2017 | Yes | Yes | No statutory investor compensation scheme | |
| CySECFCAFSA (Seychelles)+8 | 2008 | Yes | Yes | No statutory investor compensation scheme for Exness (SC) Ltd retail clients | |
| FSC (Mauritius) | 2022 | Yes | Yes | No statutory investor compensation scheme | |
| FSC (Mauritius)FSCA (South Africa) | 2016 | Yes | Yes | No FSCS-style statutory compensation scheme for primary international clients | |
| CySECASICDFSA (DIFC)+2 | 2009 | Yes | Yes | ICF up to €20,000 for eligible CySEC clients | |
| ASICFCACySEC+3 | 2009 | Yes | Yes | FSCS up to £85,000 for eligible UK clients; ICF up to €20,000 for eligible EU clients | |
| FCACySECFSCA (South Africa)+2 | 1999 | Yes | Yes | FSCS up to £85,000 for eligible UK clients; ICF up to €20,000 for eligible CySEC clients |
From our broker records. Negative balance protection and compensation schemes depend on the entity you are onboarded to and your client classification.
A 0.1-pip spread is worth nothing if the fill arrives a pip away from the price you clicked. That gap is slippage, and on a high-frequency strategy it can dwarf the spread you chose the broker for.
Say EUR/USD shows 1.16000 / 1.16001 - a tenth of a pip. You buy at 1.16001 and fill at 1.16011. The spread cost you $1 and the slippage cost you $10.
Slippage runs both ways, and market execution can improve your price as easily as worsen it. But it grows with latency, with thin liquidity and with volatility, which is why the server location and execution model below belong on a page about spreads at all.
| Broker | Execution model | Typical speed | Servers | Expert Advisors | API | Copy trading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market execution | Approx. 35ms on forex | Equinix NY4, New York; Equinix LD5, London | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Market execution / ECN-style institutional execution | Under 30ms | Equinix LD5, London | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| No Dealing Desk | Low-latency; current benchmark independently measured | Low-latency institutional infrastructure | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Market maker / principal | Millisecond execution | Global financial data-centre infrastructure | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| ECN-style / Raw pricing, liquidity-provider execution | Under 40ms | Equinix NY4 and LD5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Market execution / multi-liquidity-provider pricing | Ultra-low latency advertised; no reliable universal figure | London and Asia-Pacific | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Market maker / principal | 99% of orders executed in under 1 second | London and global data-centre infrastructure | Yes | No | Yes | |
| Market execution / STP-style CFD execution | Approx. 30ms | Equinix data-centre infrastructure, including New York and London | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| No dealing desk intervention / market execution | Under 8ms | Equinix LD4, London | Yes | Yes | Yes |
From our broker records. Brokers measure execution differently and publish under favourable conditions, so treat these as an order of magnitude rather than a stopwatch.
Every broker here permits scalping and, apart from the platform limits noted in the table, automated strategies - which is what you would expect from a group selected for pricing, since raw accounts exist largely for traders who place a lot of orders.
| Broker | Inactivity fee | Currency conversion | Min. withdrawal | Withdrawal time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None on Global; EU: 10 account-currency units/month after 6 months inactivity | Conversion at applicable exchange rate/charges; no fixed percentage published | No minimum | Same-day processing before cutoff; cards typically 3-5 business days; international wire up to 14 days | |
| No inactivity fee | Conversion rate may include a currency conversion fee | No minimum | Typically 1 business day processing; cards 1-3 business days; Skrill/Neteller 1-2 business days; bank transfer 2-5 business days | |
| Not on record | Applicable where conversion is required | Not on record | 85% processed internally in under 1 hour | |
| Not on record | Conversion at applicable exchange rate | From $1, payment-method dependent | Many withdrawals instant; otherwise generally processed within 24 hours | |
| Not on record | Conversion at applicable exchange rate | $1 equivalent | Typically processed within 1 business day; settlement varies by method | |
| Not on record | Applicable where required | $10 | Not on record | |
| $10/month after 90 days inactivity | Not on record | $5 | Instant/same-day processing where automatically approved; bank wire and cards typically 2-5 business days | |
| 10 units of base currency/month after 3 months inactivity | Conversion rate/fee applies where currencies differ | $50 for bank transfer, BPAY, Skrill and Neteller; no minimum for cards/PayPal | 1 business day for Skrill/Neteller; 1-5 business days for cards, PayPal and bank transfer | |
| Not on record | Currency conversion applies where funding/account currencies differ | No minimum | Processed 24/5; typically within 1 business day, plus payment-provider processing time |
From our broker records. Banks, card issuers and payment providers can charge on top of anything the broker does or does not charge.
For an active trader these barely register against spreads and commissions. They matter if you deposit and withdraw often, or if you fund an account and then leave it alone.
Recommended for active traders who want tight pricing with an execution record to match.

IC Markets is the highest-rated broker on our table and prices like a specialist: its Raw Spread account records an average of 0.1 pips on EUR/USD and 0.4 on GBP/USD, with $3.50 per side - about 0.8 pips all in.
The April 2026 Datalyst measurement put it at 0.17 pips across seven majors, third of the five brokers measured. Its own recorded EUR/USD average of 0.1 is the more useful number for a EUR/USD trader.
What separates it from the cheaper entries here is everything around the price: MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader and TradingView, execution around 35 milliseconds, MetaTrader servers at Equinix NY4 and cTrader in London, low-latency VPS support and a FIX API.
The $200 minimum deposit is the highest on this page, and EU clients pay 10 units of account currency a month after six dormant months, where the Global entity charges nothing.
Open an account with IC MarketsRead our full IC Markets review
Recommended for traders who want the tightest measured spreads here and can accept a young broker.

TabTrade has the tightest measured pricing on this page by a clear margin: 0.03 pips on EUR/USD and 0.04 on GBP/USD on its Edge account, against $3.50 per side - about 0.73 pips all in.
That is also what the Datalyst measurement found, at 0.04 pips across seven majors. It is worth knowing that TabTrade published that measurement, in which it comes first; the figures are consistent with our own records, but a scorecard from a participant deserves reading as such.
Execution averages under 30 milliseconds from MetaTrader 5 at Equinix LD5 in London, and its support scores higher than any broker we rate.
Against that: it launched in 2026, so there is no track record, and it runs on a single Mauritius licence with no statutory compensation scheme and, on our record, no negative balance protection. On a leveraged product bought for its pricing, that last one deserves a deliberate decision rather than a shrug.
Recommended for high-volume traders, where the commission matters more than the spread.

Fusion Markets charges $2.25 per lot per side on its Zero account. Every other raw account on this page charges $3.50, so a round turn costs $4.50 instead of $7 - a $2.50 saving per lot that applies to every trade regardless of what spreads are doing.
At 100 lots a month that is $250; at 500 it is $1,250. For a high-volume trader it is the most reliable saving available on this page, because commission is fixed where spreads are not.
It asks no minimum deposit, offers 90+ pairs, and runs MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader and TradingView - a fuller platform set than several higher-rated brokers.
Founded in Melbourne in 2017 and holding an ASIC licence alongside Seychelles and Vanuatu registrations, it rates 7.8 overall: strong on regulation and cost, weaker on the breadth that lifts the bigger names. Its EUR/USD average is published through a live spread tool rather than as a fixed figure, so it is not in the comparison column above.
Open an account with Fusion MarketsRead our full Fusion Markets review
Recommended for traders who want to choose how their costs are structured.
Exness runs eight account types, and two of them matter here. Raw Spread quotes from 0.0 pips with up to $3.50 per side; Zero quotes genuine zero spreads on a set of heavily traded instruments and charges an instrument-specific commission instead. Very few brokers offer both structures.
The Datalyst measurement put it second of five at 0.10 pips across seven majors and 0.04 on EUR/USD - tighter than IC Markets on that dataset.
Note the figure in our own comparison table above is 0.9 pips, because that is its Standard account. The two numbers describe different products, and the gap between them is the clearest illustration on this page of why the account name matters more than the number.
It holds eleven licences across as many jurisdictions, though no statutory compensation scheme stands behind the entity most international clients are onboarded to, and its advertised leverage is unlimited - a phrase that should be read as a warning rather than a feature.
Recommended for international traders wanting IC Markets-style pricing outside its regulated entities.

IC Trading records an average of 0.1 pips on EUR/USD and 0.3 on GBP/USD on its Raw Spread account, with $3.50 per side - about 0.8 pips all in, effectively matching IC Markets.
The platform set matches too: MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader and TradingView, with execution under 40 milliseconds, scalping permitted and automated strategies supported from 0.01 lots.
The difference is the regulatory footing, and it is the reason this broker rates 7.0 overall while pricing at 9.4. Founded in 2022 and operating under a single Mauritius FSC licence, it has neither the track record nor the multi-jurisdiction structure of the firms above it.
It also asks $200 to open. For a trader who wants this pricing and cannot be onboarded to an ASIC or CySEC entity elsewhere, it is a coherent choice - made knowingly.
Open an account with IC TradingRead our full IC Trading review
Recommended for traders comparing raw pricing against genuinely tight commission-free accounts.
IUX is the most interesting account structure on this page. Its Raw account runs the familiar 0.0 pips with $7 round turn, but its Standard and Pro accounts are commission-free from 0.2 and 0.1 pips respectively - unusually tight for spread-only pricing, and worth comparing directly against its own raw account.
Its recorded Standard average is 0.8 pips as at July 2026, which is the honest figure for the commission-free product; the Datalyst-adjacent figure of about 0.1 pips applies to the Raw account.
It lists 120+ currency pairs, more than any other broker on this page, and runs MetaTrader 5 alongside its own web and mobile terminals.
It rates 6.8 overall, the lowest here. Mauritius and South African registrations, no statutory compensation scheme, and advertised leverage up to 1:3000 - a figure that lowers margin requirements and raises the speed at which an account can be emptied.
Recommended for traders who want competitive spread-only pricing and a $5 entry.

XM is the commission-free entry in this ten. Its Standard and Ultra Low accounts charge no commission and record an average of about 0.8 pips on EUR/USD - which, once the $7 round turn is added to the raw accounts above, is a comparable all-in cost with none of the arithmetic.
The Datalyst measurement put it widest of the five at 0.74 pips across seven majors, but that comparison excludes commission, so it compares XM's total cost against other brokers' partial cost. On an all-in basis it sits mid-table.
The account opens for $5, the lowest non-zero entry here, on MetaTrader 4 and 5 with 55+ pairs and 24/7 support. The broker emphasises an execution model with no requotes or order rejections.
It charges $10 a month after 90 days of inactivity, the shortest dormancy window on this page.
Recommended for raw-spread traders who want TradingView in the same account.

Eightcap records 0.06 pips on EUR/USD and 0.2 on GBP/USD on its Raw account - the second-tightest recorded average here - with $3.50 per side, about 0.76 pips all in.
Execution averages around 30 milliseconds across Equinix infrastructure including New York and London, which is quicker than the roughly 48ms the broker is often credited with.
Its Standard account is commission-free from 1.0 pips, so both structures are available in one place for anyone wanting to compare them on their own trading rather than in the abstract.
MetaTrader 4 and 5 sit alongside TradingView and TradeLocker, and the account opens from $100. It is ASIC, FCA, CySEC and Bahamas SCB regulated - the strongest regulatory footing among the cheaper half of this page.
Recommended for traders who want the fastest execution here and every major platform.

FxPro is the most expensive broker on this page and the fastest. Its recorded cTrader average is 0.43 pips on EUR/USD and 0.70 on GBP/USD, which with $3.50 per side gives about 1.13 pips all in - the highest here, and the Datalyst measurement agrees at 0.49 across seven majors.
What you get for it is execution under 8 milliseconds from Equinix LD4, four times quicker than anything else on this page, plus MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader, TradingView and its own platform, with cTrader Copy and a FIX API.
For a strategy where fill quality dominates, that trade can be worth making - slippage of a pip costs more than the half-pip of extra spread. For anyone else on this page it is the wrong end of the cost table.
Trading since 1999, it is the oldest firm here, holds FCA and CySEC licences among others, and asks no minimum deposit on the Standard account.
This list ranks on our costs score - which weighs spreads, commission and overnight financing together - and prints that score beside every broker. We do not rank a broker higher for advertising 0.0 pips. What we weigh:
A broker that is cheap and unregulated is not a bargain, which is why this page prints the overall rating beside the cost rating and why the two columns do not agree.
The average, by a distance. A minimum tells you the best price the broker has ever quoted; an average tells you what trading there was actually like.
On our records six of these ten advertise the identical 0.0-pip minimum and their recorded averages run from 0.03 pips to 0.43 - a fourteen-fold difference behind one shared headline.
No. Accounts quoting 0.0 charge a commission instead, typically $3.50 per lot per side. That is $7 for the round turn, or about 0.7 pips on a standard EUR/USD position before any spread at all.
A zero spread with a $10 commission is more expensive than a 0.2-pip spread with a $5 one. Add the two before comparing.
Fusion Markets, at $2.25 per lot per side - $4.50 round turn against the $7 that most raw accounts charge.
That $2.50 per lot is the largest structural cost advantage on this page, and it compounds: at 100 lots a month it is $250, and it applies whatever the spread happens to be doing.
Because our recorded averages are not all measured on the same account. Thirty-four of the hundred brokers we rate record a raw-account average, eleven record a standard-account average, and fifty-four name no account at all - so sorting on that column would rank a broker's standard account against another's raw account and call the result a ranking.
The list orders on our costs score, which weighs spread, commission and financing together, and that score is printed beside every broker so you can check the order rather than trust it.
No. Spreads track liquidity, and liquidity is not constant. EUR/USD is tightest while London and New York are both open and widest around rollover, holidays, and the first minutes of the trading week.
They also widen sharply on economic releases and central bank decisions - exactly the moments a lot of people want to trade. A broker quoting 0.0 in the London afternoon may quote several pips thirty seconds after an inflation print.
No, and this page is a good illustration. Two of the ten brokers here rate below 7.0 overall while pricing among the best in the market, because pricing is one of six things we score.
Check the entity holding your account, its regulator, whether client money is segregated and whether any compensation scheme applies, and treat the spread as the last question rather than the first.
Slippage is the gap between the price you clicked and the price you got. It can go either way - market execution fills at the best available price, which is sometimes better than requested.
It matters here because it can be larger than the spread you chose the broker for. Saving 0.1 pips on the quote is pointless if the fill is routinely a pip away, which is why execution model and server location appear on a page about spreads.
On a raw account, an average of 0.0 to 0.2 pips is genuinely competitive - before commission. On a commission-free standard account, anything under about 0.8 pips is reasonable, because the broker's entire charge is in that number.
Compare like with like. A raw average and a standard average are prices for different products.
The average, by a distance. A minimum tells you the best price the broker has ever quoted; an average tells you what trading there was actually like.
On our records six of these ten advertise the identical 0.0-pip minimum and their recorded averages run from 0.03 pips to 0.43 - a fourteen-fold difference behind one shared headline.
No. Accounts quoting 0.0 charge a commission instead, typically $3.50 per lot per side. That is $7 for the round turn, or about 0.7 pips on a standard EUR/USD position before any spread at all.
A zero spread with a $10 commission is more expensive than a 0.2-pip spread with a $5 one. Add the two before comparing.
Fusion Markets, at $2.25 per lot per side - $4.50 round turn against the $7 that most raw accounts charge.
That $2.50 per lot is the largest structural cost advantage on this page, and it compounds: at 100 lots a month it is $250, and it applies whatever the spread happens to be doing.
Because our recorded averages are not all measured on the same account. Thirty-four of the hundred brokers we rate record a raw-account average, eleven record a standard-account average, and fifty-four name no account at all - so sorting on that column would rank a broker's standard account against another's raw account and call the result a ranking.
The list orders on our costs score, which weighs spread, commission and financing together, and that score is printed beside every broker so you can check the order rather than trust it.
No. Spreads track liquidity, and liquidity is not constant. EUR/USD is tightest while London and New York are both open and widest around rollover, holidays, and the first minutes of the trading week.
They also widen sharply on economic releases and central bank decisions - exactly the moments a lot of people want to trade. A broker quoting 0.0 in the London afternoon may quote several pips thirty seconds after an inflation print.
No, and this page is a good illustration. Two of the ten brokers here rate below 7.0 overall while pricing among the best in the market, because pricing is one of six things we score.
Check the entity holding your account, its regulator, whether client money is segregated and whether any compensation scheme applies, and treat the spread as the last question rather than the first.
Slippage is the gap between the price you clicked and the price you got. It can go either way - market execution fills at the best available price, which is sometimes better than requested.
It matters here because it can be larger than the spread you chose the broker for. Saving 0.1 pips on the quote is pointless if the fill is routinely a pip away, which is why execution model and server location appear on a page about spreads.
On a raw account, an average of 0.0 to 0.2 pips is genuinely competitive - before commission. On a commission-free standard account, anything under about 0.8 pips is reasonable, because the broker's entire charge is in that number.
Compare like with like. A raw average and a standard average are prices for different products.
All 97 brokers that meet the rule at the top of this page, in the same order. The ten above are the ones we have written about.