Futures vs CFDsBoth give you leveraged exposure in either direction. One is a standardised contract on a public exchange; the other is a private agreement with your broker. Almost every practical difference falls out of that.The same company, the same price movement, two completely different products. One makes you an owner. The other makes you a counterparty, with a nightly bill.

Buy a share and you own a piece of a company. Depending on the class of share you may get a vote, you receive dividends the company declares, and you sit - last in line, but in line - in its capital structure.
Trade a share CFD and you own a contract with your broker. The contract's value follows the share price. That is the entire relationship, and everything below follows from it.
Both give you the price movement. Only one gives you the company.
You are on the share register. Voting rights at general meetings, subject to share class.
Dividends arrive as dividends, with whatever tax treatment your jurisdiction gives them.
Corporate actions apply to you directly: rights issues, scrip options, takeover elections.
No overnight financing on fully paid shares. You have already paid the full price, so nothing accrues.
Shorting requires borrowing the stock, which is often unavailable or expensive to retail investors.
No entry on any register. No votes, ever, regardless of position size.
Dividend adjustments rather than dividends: a cash credit if long, a debit if short. Economically similar, legally a different event.
Corporate actions are handled by the broker under its contract terms rather than by your choice.
Financing charged every night the leveraged position is open, which over months becomes a serious cost.
Shorting is a button. This is the single biggest practical advantage of the wrapper.
Neither is better in the abstract. A short-term directional trade and a decade-long holding are different jobs, and these are different tools.
When a share goes ex-dividend it typically drops by roughly the dividend amount, because that value has left the company. A shareholder does not care: they lose it on the price and get it back in cash.
A long CFD holder gets a dividend adjustment for the same reason - otherwise the mechanical price drop would be a pure loss caused by nothing. So far, symmetrical.
The asymmetry is financing. A long CFD on a high-yielding share collects dividend adjustments and pays financing every single night. Depending on rates and the broker's markup, the financing can consume most or all of the dividend. The yield you were attracted to is not a yield you get to keep.
A short CFD position pays the dividend adjustment out, not in.
This is the risk that belongs to single shares specifically. An index absorbs one company's bad night; the company does not.
Wednesday, 4pm
A five per cent stop. In normal trading that is a wide one.
Wednesday, 4:05pm
The information exists. The market to trade it does not.
Thursday, 9:30am
The share never traded at $95, or $92, or $88. There was no price between the two levels for a stop to catch.
Earnings dates are published weeks ahead. This is one of the few major risks in trading that is entirely scheduled, which makes holding an oversized leveraged position through one a choice rather than an accident.
Selling a share you do not own means borrowing it first. For most retail investors that is either unavailable, expensive, or both, and it can be recalled at short notice.
A CFD reduces that to pressing sell. The broker handles its own hedging and borrowing behind the scenes, and you have a short position in seconds.
It is not unconditional. Brokers restrict shorting on specific names when the underlying borrow dries up, during certain corporate events, or when regulators impose bans. A sell button today does not guarantee a sell button next week on the same stock.
No. You have a contract with the broker. You are not on the register and you have no shareholder rights.
Not as shareholders. Brokers apply a cash adjustment reflecting the dividend: a credit on long positions, a debit on shorts. The economics are similar; the legal and tax treatment is not.
No.
No. With margin shares you own the shares and have borrowed money against them. With a CFD you own a derivative. Both are leveraged; only one makes you a shareholder.
Technically yes, if you meet margin. Financing accrues nightly throughout, so for long holding periods it is usually the more expensive route by a wide margin.
No. Availability depends on the broker's ability to hedge, and can be withdrawn during corporate events or regulatory restrictions.
The price collapses and the broker handles the position under its contract terms. You do not become a creditor of the company. You never had a claim on it, only on the broker.
Direct Market Access, where your order interacts more directly with the underlying exchange order book. It changes execution, not ownership. A DMA share CFD is still a CFD.
No. A stop defines the level you want out at, not the price you get. If the share reopens below your stop, that is where you exit. See stop-loss orders.
Our questionnaire ranks all 100 brokers against your own answers in about a minute - including, if it matters to you, filtering out the ones whose leverage and protections do not suit how you intend to trade.
Find my brokerBrowse all 100 reviews
Nothing here is financial advice. Leveraged products can lose more than they make.