Share CFDs vs buying sharesThe same company, the same price movement, two completely different products. One makes you an owner. The other makes you a counterparty, with a nightly bill.A Bitcoin CFD rises and falls with Bitcoin and gives you none of it. No coins, no wallet, no keys - and, less obviously, no way out while the market is shut and the price is moving.

A cryptocurrency CFD is a contract with your broker whose value tracks the price of a coin. Bitcoin goes up, the long position gains. Bitcoin goes down, it loses. Straightforward enough.
What it is not is Bitcoin. You do not receive coins, you do not need a wallet, you cannot send anything on-chain, and you cannot withdraw the position to an address you control. You have exposure to a number.
These are frequently discussed as two routes to the same thing. They are two different products with different risks, and neither is safer in general - they are unsafe in different directions.
You hold the asset. It can be moved, spent on-chain, staked where the network allows it, and withdrawn to a wallet only you control.
The risk moves onto you or onto an exchange. Lose the seed phrase and the coins are gone permanently. There is no support line that can reverse it.
Leaving it on an exchange swaps key risk for counterparty risk: exchange failure, withdrawal suspension, insolvency.
No leverage unless you deliberately add it, and no nightly financing on a plain holding.
You hold a contract. No wallet, no seed phrase, no private key to lose, no on-chain transaction to get wrong.
Short positions are as easy as long ones. You press sell rather than arranging to borrow the asset.
Leverage is normally available, which is exactly the problem in a market that can move ten per cent in a session.
Your counterparty is the broker, and financing accrues every night the position stays open.
Removing key risk does not remove risk. It replaces it with broker risk, leverage risk and financing, and adds the trading-hours problem below.
Availability is high but far from universal, and the qualifications matter more here than in any other market we track.
So roughly one broker in five either cannot sell you a crypto CFD or can only do so depending on where you live. Check the entity, not the brand: the same logic set out in [how to choose a broker](/insights/how-to/how-to-choose-a-broker/).
Brokers routinely cap crypto leverage well below what they allow on major currency pairs. That is not caution for its own sake - a major pair moving three per cent in a day is a notable session, and a major cryptocurrency can do considerably more without anything unusual happening.
The consequence people miss is that low leverage in a volatile market is not the same as low risk. At 1:5, a ten per cent move against a position wipes out half the margin supporting it. The market did something ordinary; the account did not.
No crash, no exchange failure, no black swan. Just a session of the kind crypto produces regularly.
$10,000 exposure at 1:5 leverage
Loss as a share of margin50%Half the margin, on a move the asset makes routinely. Size from the stop distance and the asset's actual range, not from the leverage the broker permits.
Crypto is the only market in this library where the thing you are tracking never stops and the thing you are holding does. Not every broker offers weekend crypto trading, and the ones that do often run maintenance windows.
Friday, CFD market closes
A stop four per cent below the market. On a weekday that is a working stop.
Saturday and Sunday
The stop level is reached and passed. Nothing happens, because there is no market to execute in.
Monday, market reopens
The stop was not ignored and the broker did nothing wrong. There were simply no prices between the two levels.
This is gap risk, and crypto has the worst version of it because the underlying market genuinely never closes. Check your broker's weekend hours before holding a leveraged crypto position over one.
Holding Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and a handful of smaller coins looks like a spread of positions. During a broad move it very often is not - crypto markets become highly correlated exactly when it matters, and five coins fall together.
The same trap as correlated currency positions, in a market that moves further and faster. Count the exposure, not the number of tickers.
It is frequently sold as one, and the argument goes that a capped supply must protect against a debasing currency. Supply caps are real. The conclusion does not follow.
In practice crypto has often behaved as a risk asset, falling alongside technology shares when liquidity tightens and rising when it loosens. Higher inflation tends to produce higher interest rates, and higher rates have tended to pressure crypto rather than support it - the same real-yield mechanism that drives gold, working through a much more speculative asset.
Scarcity only matters in combination with demand. A fixed supply of something nobody wants is still worth very little.
Four of these are about the product rather than the coin, which is the ratio the marketing usually inverts.
No. You hold a contract with your broker whose value tracks the price. There are no coins involved at any point.
No. There is nothing to withdraw. The account holds currency, not coins.
Not for CFDs. That is one of their genuine conveniences, and the reason people who do not want to manage keys use them.
Because the price moves much further. Brokers and regulators require more margin against an asset that can move ten per cent in a day.
Some do, some run weekend maintenance windows, and some close entirely. This varies by broker and is worth confirming before you hold one over a weekend.
Not as an entitlement. Those belong to holders of the asset. A broker may make an adjustment under its contract terms, but you should not assume it.
No. Staking requires holding the underlying asset.
No. It is a crypto asset designed to hold a value, backed by reserves whose quality and structure vary by issuer. Stablecoins have lost their peg before.
It is an analogy, not an equivalence. Both are non-sovereign and supply-limited. Their volatility, history, market structure and sources of demand are not remotely comparable.
Confusing exposure with ownership, and then sizing the position as though it were a currency pair. The product is a derivative on one of the most volatile assets retail traders can access.
Our questionnaire ranks all 100 brokers against your own answers in about a minute - including, if it matters to you, filtering out the ones whose leverage and protections do not suit how you intend to trade.
Find my brokerBrowse all 100 reviews
Nothing here is financial advice. Leveraged products can lose more than they make.