What happens if your broker goes bankruptYour money is not with a brand. It is with one specific company, in one specific country, under one specific set of rules - and which one decides almost everything about what you get back.Eighty-nine of our hundred brokers say client money is segregated. Twenty-two of them sit behind no compensation scheme at all. Those are answers to different questions, and only one of them pays you back.

Segregation means qualifying client money is kept apart from the broker's own operating funds. Client deposits go into designated client accounts; the money the firm uses to pay salaries, rent and marketing sits somewhere else.
The point is what happens if the firm fails. Properly protected client money can be dealt with separately from the assets available to ordinary corporate creditors, rather than being pooled with everything else and fought over.
That is a genuine and important protection. It is also narrower than the marketing implies, and the gap between the two is worth understanding before you fund an account.
These four figures are the article. Segregation is close to universal; the things people assume come with it are not.
Segregation is nearly universal, so it barely distinguishes one broker from another. Compensation cover distinguishes them enormously, and it is far less prominently displayed.
Segregated does not mean individually held. A broker with fifty thousand clients does not open fifty thousand bank accounts. It runs pooled - or omnibus - client accounts, and keeps its own internal ledger of who is owed what.
So the balance on your platform is not a window onto a bank account containing your money. It is the broker's record of your entitlement within a much larger pool.
This is normal, it is how the industry works, and it makes one thing critically important: the accuracy of the broker's records. If the ledger and the pool disagree, that discrepancy is a shortfall, and working out whose money is missing is exactly the problem an insolvency practitioner inherits.
These get used interchangeably in broker marketing. They cover different things and only one of them is a promise to give you money.
| Protection | What it actually does |
|---|---|
| Client money segregation | Keeps qualifying client funds separate from the firm's own money, so they are not available to ordinary corporate creditors. |
| Investor compensation scheme | Pays eligible clients, up to a limit, if an authorised firm fails and cannot meet its obligations. |
| Negative balance protection | Stops a retail account owing more than its balance after a violent market move. Nothing to do with the firm failing. |
A broker can have the first without the second. Twenty-two in our records do exactly that.
Segregation decides where your money sits. Compensation decides whether you get it back if it is not there.
A broker fails on a Tuesday with properly segregated funds and accurate records. This is the good case, and it is still not fast.
Day one
The number on your screen is a claim, not a cheque. Nothing can be paid out until it is verified.
Reconciliation
Paying anyone early risks paying them more than their share while somebody else gets less. So nobody is paid early.
The two possible answers
A shortfall can then be topped up by a compensation scheme. If the entity you dealt with belongs to one.
This is why 'my funds are segregated' is not the same as 'my funds are available'. Both can be true and you still cannot pay your rent with them this month.
A broker group can run a UK company, an EU company, an Australian company and an international one, all under one logo, one website and one login page.
Those are separate legal entities with different regulators, different client money rules and different compensation cover. The UK entity might sit inside a scheme paying eligible clients up to £85,000; the international entity might sit inside nothing at all.
Which one you signed with is written in your client agreement, and it is the single most important sentence in it. The broker licence check covers how to establish this properly.
Ask these in writing before a significant deposit. A firm that cannot answer clearly about its own structure has told you something.
No. It is a meaningful legal protection against the broker's creditors. It is not a guarantee against fraud, accounting failure, bank failure or delay.
Usually not. Client funds are pooled, with the broker's internal ledger recording each client's entitlement.
When the money actually available is less than the total clients are recorded as being owed. It can arise from fraud, error or a failure elsewhere in the chain.
That is a separate problem from broker failure, and segregation does not solve it. The outcome depends on banking law, the account structure and any deposit protection that applies.
Not automatically. Deposit protection schemes have their own eligibility rules, and a pooled brokerage account is not the same as your personal bank account.
No. Segregation is about where money is held. Negative balance protection is about whether trading losses can exceed your balance.
Your claim reflects your account value including realised profits, not just what you deposited. Open positions have to be valued or closed before that figure is final.
Usually very little, as a claim. It is informal marketing language rather than a defined protection category, and in our records it is the most common answer given in place of naming an actual bank.
Yes. Rules, audits and reporting reduce the risk. They do not make fraud or error impossible.
Our questionnaire ranks all 100 brokers against your own answers in about a minute - including, if it matters to you, filtering out the ones whose leverage and protections do not suit how you intend to trade.
Find my brokerBrowse all 100 reviews
Nothing here is financial advice. Leveraged products can lose more than they make.