How interest rates move currenciesA central bank raises rates and the currency falls. This happens constantly, it is not a malfunction, and the reason is the single most useful thing to understand about macro trading.It will not tell you which way to trade. What it tells you is when the market is about to become a different market, which is more useful and much less often acted on.

An economic calendar lists scheduled releases: inflation, employment, growth, central bank decisions, survey data. For each one it gives the time, the country, the previous result, the consensus forecast and, once published, the actual figure.
Most traders use it as a source of trade ideas. It is far better as a risk tool, and the difference between those two uses is most of what this article is about.
Every row has a previous, a forecast and an actual. Reading only the actual is reading a third of the information.
| Field | What it is for |
|---|---|
| Previous | Last period's result. Sets the direction of travel, and can be revised, which changes the story retroactively. |
| Forecast | The consensus expectation. This is what is already in the price. |
| Actual | The new figure. On its own it means nothing. |
| Actual minus forecast | The surprise. This is what the market trades. |
Two releases can print an identical actual and produce opposite reactions, because one beat the forecast and the other missed it.
Employment data, two months running. The published figure is identical both times.
205,000 jobs, twice
Same result, twenty times the surprise205,000The first is a non-event. The second forces a wholesale reassessment of the labour market and the rate path. The figure never changed.
Ten minutes at the start of a session, then two decisions. This is the whole method.
Then check it again after any daylight-saving changeover. Countries switch on different dates, so the relative timing between London, New York and Sydney shifts twice a year. A memorised local release time is wrong for several weeks each year.
If you trade EUR/USD, GBP/USD and USD/JPY, that is four economies, not three, and every one of your positions is exposed to the US releases. Filtering removes noise and reveals overlap.
Central bank decisions, inflation, employment. The importance rating is an estimate rather than a promise: a low-rated release can move markets when it speaks to whatever the market is currently worried about.
Not what you might trade, but what you are holding right now. This is the step that turns the calendar from an idea generator into a risk tool.
Reduce the position, close it, or accept the event risk deliberately. Any of the three is defensible. Making the choice at the moment the number lands is not a choice, it is a reaction.
Headline, core, revisions, and the components underneath. Then look at what bond yields did, which is the cleanest read on how the market interpreted the policy implication.
A release lands. The currency jumps. Ninety seconds later it is back where it started and heading the other way.
This is normal. The initial move is the headline being processed. What follows is the rest of the release being read: the core figure that contradicts the headline, the downward revision to last month, the component that shows the strength was concentrated in one sector.
A central bank decision has an extra stage on top of this. The rate is announced, then the statement is read, then the press conference begins and a single sentence about future policy reprices everything again. Three separate repricings inside an hour, and the first one is often the least informative.
An empty calendar does not mean a quiet market.
Every broker in our records offers research of some kind, though the depth varies enormously and the label covers very different things.
Third-party tools such as Trading Central and Autochartist appear repeatedly across our records. What matters is whether the calendar you use handles time zones correctly, not whose logo is on it.
If you cannot answer the last one, the position is too big.
The result for the preceding period. It can be revised later, which sometimes changes the interpretation of the current release.
The relationship between them. The surprise is what the market trades, not the level.
No. It may have been expected, another component may have been weak, a previous figure may have been revised down, or the implication for policy may not be what the headline suggests.
Considerably. A strong print alongside a large downward revision to the previous month can be read as net weakness, and markets frequently trade it that way.
No. If the result matches expectations and the guidance is unchanged, a major release can pass with barely a flicker.
Yes, when it speaks to the market's current preoccupation. Ratings are estimates of typical importance, not of this particular week's.
Removing a stop does not remove event risk. It removes your control over it. If the position is too large to hold through a release, the answer is a smaller position, not a missing stop.
You can, and people do. Both orders can trigger, both can slip, and the move can reverse straight through your entry. It is a strategy with well-known failure modes rather than a free option.
Yes. It tells you when spreads widen, liquidity thins and slippage rises. You do not have to forecast the number to benefit from knowing when it lands.
Our questionnaire ranks all 100 brokers against your own answers in about a minute - including, if it matters to you, filtering out the ones whose leverage and protections do not suit how you intend to trade.
Find my brokerBrowse all 100 reviews
Nothing here is financial advice. Leveraged products can lose more than they make.